Goals missed by both Coaches, Gameplay said to be “Satisfactory”
The coach to Kladno team, Miroslav Koubek, claims the draw match between Kladno and Mladá Boleslav to be a well-performed theatre play, in which both teams showed dynamic gameplay. Dušan Uhrin, coach of Boleslav, said the pace of the match was very fast throughout both halves. Each coach had different issues to handle before the kickoff. While Uhrin had to cope with the absence of many players he would have liked to include in his tactical plans, Koubek had the entire pool of players ready and willing to battle, without any health or disciplinary limitations.
Bolka TV presents the highlights of the match SK Kladno - FK Mladá Boleslav.
"We had certain problems with setting the basic roster before the game," Dušan Uhrin complained after the draw in Kladno. He added that both Dittrich and Kysela had not been able to train for a week before the match because of muscle complications, Brunclík was in a state of limited physical aptitude after injury. Further shortcomings for the team were Ševinský and Rajnoch, who had received red cards in the previous match. Nesvadba and Ordoš couldn't play for reasons of injury. "In spite of it all, the pace of the game vas very fast from the beginning to the end," Coach Uhrin said.
"What we saw was a nice and dramatic theatresque performance in which the game constantly shifted back and forth," Coach Miroslav Koubek of Kladno evaluated the match.
"Although we faced a ten-minute performance drop in the second half, ball possession was on our side near the end of the game. Much to our distress, we weren't able to make use of the score opportunities we had," Uhrin said. He acknowledged that Kladno had a number of score opportunities, yet he regretted that the referee had missed two mishaps by Kladno defenders that should have been awarded with penalty kicks. Palát was attacked shortly before the intermission and Mikolanda suffered some unfair behavior in the second half.
"The adversary were gaining score opportunities through our right flank," Uhrin noticed.
Miroslav Koubek of Kladno admitted to a tactical intention of using the assumed weak spot in the right flank of Boleslav's defending line. It was where Uhrin had been forced to make major changes.
"A part of our strategy was the reliable defending phase with a thorough coverage of the elite Boleslav pair, Matějovský and Abraham. Our offensive was focused on fast rebounds, in which Kalina excelled beyond par," Koubek added.
"The reasons why we didn't take the win were Kalina's failure to score in the opportunities he had and lack of effectiveness in making the best of Boleslav's weak spot in the defense line. I would have gladly taken the draw before the match; now I feel a little disappointed, but not a whole lot, Koubek retorted.
"It was going to be a draw," Uhrin concluded. He was well aware that the mistakes by the defenders repeatedly allowed Kalina to gain access to Miller's goal. The coach clearly understood that he and the whole team should be grateful that Miller was able to uphold a zero score for Boleslav.
"I feel no reproach towards Kalina, Miller did an excellent job in reducing the shooting angles," Koubek said in a conciliating tone. He admitted that the Boleslav had players of better quality, a fact that gave him some chills down the spine when Uhrin's team pressed harder towards the end of the game, gaining dominance in the gameplay.
